TABLE 2

Kinetic parameters quantified using the substrate depletion and metabolite formation approach in pooled HLMs

Data shown are mean ± S.D. of three to four independent experiments with duplicate determinations per experiment. Error propagation was applied to the S.D. of Km,u and CLint using Embedded Image where Embedded Image ± Embedded Image and Embedded Image ± Embedded Image represents the mean ± S.D. of fuinc and Km or CLint,u, respectively. The values shown here were used as initial estimates for the P450 and UGT kinetic model (Fig. 3).

PathwayInhibitorVmaxKmaKm,ubCLint
pmol/min per milligramμMnMml/min per milligram
THC depletionNone3150 ± 13100.18 ± 0.107 ± 5435.3 ± 217.0
Sulfaphenazole (10 μM)1064 ± 5800.57 ± 0.4724 ± 2150.9 ± 21.3
11-OH-THC formationNone803 ± 1620.18 ± 0.058 ± 3111.1 ± 48.8
Sulfaphenazole (10 μM)515 ± 1361.42 ± 0.1360 ± 218.7 ± 2.9
11-OH-THC depletion (P450s)None2550 ± 10711.0 ± 0.6669 ± 2963.8 ± 1.7
Sulfaphenazole (10 μM)1701 ± 96.010.5 ± 1.1679 ± 2422.5 ± 0.9
Itraconazole (2 μM)194 ± 1111.7 ± 1.1112 ± 781.8 ± 0.6
COOH-THC formationNone8 ± 11.5 ± 0.3c92 ± 450.09 ± 0.04
Sulfaphenazole (10 μM)n.d.n.d.n.d.0.01 ± 0.00d
Itraconazole (2 μM)5 ± 10.98 ± 0.5563 ± 420.09 ± 0.07
11-OH-THC depletion (UGTs)None910 ± 991.87 ± 0.24114 ± 528.1 ± 3.9
  • n.d., not determined.

  • Inhibition by sulfaphenazole did not lead to saturation of COOH-THC formation, and, as such, Vmax and Km could not be determined.

  • a Not adjusted for incubation binding (fuinc).

  • b Adjusted for incubation binding (fuinc).

  • c COOH-THC formation was fitted using a substrate inhibition model (eq. 8); Ki was 52.1 ± 14.3 μM.

  • d CLint was determined from the linear slope of [11-OH-THC] vs. velocity of COOH-THC formation.