Regular Article
Sequence of the 5′-Flanking Region of CYP3A5: Comparative Analysis with CYP3A4 and CYP3A7

https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1994.2870Get rights and content

Abstract

Two genomic clones containing the 3′-end of CYP3A7, the whole 5′-flanking region plus the first exon of CYP3A5 were isolated from two different human genomic banks and sequenced. The 5′-flanking region of CYP3A5, from nucleotide -1 to -1434, was 60% and 59% similar with the corresponding regions of CYP3A4 and CYP3A7, respectively. However, the similarity increased to 74% when regions from nucleotide -1 to -700 were compared and droped to less than 42% for regions upstream from -700. The CYP3A5 promoter contains a CATA box instead of the typical TATA box and a basic transcription element (BTE). Other consensus sequences previously found in CYP3A4 and CYP3A7 were also identified in the 5′-flanking of CYP3A5 from -1 to -700. Both CYP3A5 and CYP3A7 genes appear to be tandemly associated and transcribed in the same direction on chromosome 7.

References (0)

Cited by (58)

  • Genetic contribution to variable human CYP3A-mediated metabolism

    2012, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, recent publication of the sequence for the entire CYP3A gene locus has revealed the presence of two CYP3A pseudogenes, CYP3AP1 and CYP3AP2 [87]. Importantly, the 5′-flanking and exon-1 sequence for CYP3AP1 is identical to that described by Jounaïdi et al. [86] as the putative CYP3A5 promoter sequence. The true 5′-flanking sequence for CYP3A5*1A (AC005020), is homologous to that of CYP3AP1 (89%), but contains important differences.

  • The induction of cytochrome P450 3A5 (CYP3A5) in the human liver and intestine is mediated by the xenobiotic sensors pregnane X receptor (PXR) and constitutively activated receptor (CAR)

    2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry
    Citation Excerpt :

    Previous analyses of the inducibility of hepatic CYP3A5 produced conflicting results (11–14). Thus, the original analyses of the presumptive CYP3A5 promoter (15, 16) were invalid (10, 17) because of confusion between the real CYP3A5 5′-region and an almost identical pseudogene sequence localized ∼20 kb upstream of the CYP3A5 gene. A more recent analysis of the correct gene failed to detect rifampin-induced transcription (18).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text