Skip to main content
Log in

Gemfibrozil absorption and elimination in kidney and liver disease

  • Originals
  • Published:
Klinische Wochenschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The disposition of the lipid-lowering drug gemfibrozil was studied in patients with either renal (n= 8) or hepatic disease (n= 8) and compared to those of healthy volunteers (n= 6). Gemfibrozil was determined in plasma and urine by means of a HPLC method. Urine was also analyzed for gemfibrozil conjugates.

Following oral administration of 900 mg gemfibrozil, maximal plasma levels of the parent drug were 46.1±15.8 μg/ml, attained after 2.2±1.1 h. In chronic renal failure and in liver cirrhosis the plasma concentrations of gemfibrozil did not significantly differ from that of controls except in those patients who were comedicated with antacids. These patients had significantly lower Cmax and AUC values. The elimination half-life of the drug was 1.5 h in controls, 2.4 h in renal failure, and 2.1 h in liver disease. In healthy volunteers, only 0.02 to 0.15% of the given dose was recovered in the urine as parent gemfibrozil, while conjugates made up 7–14%. In patients with renal failure also, only traces of parent gemfibrozil could be detected, and conjugates accounted for 0.5–9.8%. In those with liver disease, however, about 0.1–0.2% were recovered in urine as parent gemfibrozil and up to 50% as conjugates. Strikingly, the amount of excreted conjugates in the urine was positively correlated to the direct bilirubin plasma concentration. It can be concluded that the elimination of gemfibrozil is not significantly influenced by renal failure. However, comedication with antacids markedly reduced plasma disposition of the drug. Patients with severe liver disease excreted more conjugated gemfibrozil via the kidney than did healthy controls. Thus, transfer across the canalicular cell membrane to the bile duct, rather than drug metabolization, is primarily disturbed in liver disease. Gemfibrozil accumulation is unlikely to occur in either kidney or liver disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Clr :

creatinine clearance (ml/min)

HPLC:

high pressure liquid chromatography

Cmax :

maximal plasma concentration (μg/ml)

tmax :

time (h) after which Cmax is attained

ke :

elimination rate constant (h−1)

t1/2 :

elimination half-life (h)

Ae :

amount of drug excreted into the urine (% of given dose)

MRT:

mean residence time (h)

AUMC:

area under the first moment curve (μg h2/ml)

AUC:

area under the plasma level time curve (μg·h/ml)

ANOVA:

analysis of variance

References

  1. Bennet WM (1981) Altering drug dose in patients with diseases of kidney and liver. In: Anderson RJ, Schrier RW (eds) Clinical use of drugs in patients with kidney and liver disease. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 16–23

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buscher H-P, Fricker G, Gerok W, Kramer W, Kurz G, Müller M, Schneider S (1986) Membrane transport of amphillic compounds by hepatocytes. In: Greten H, Windler E, Beisiegel U (eds) Receptor-mediated uptake in the liver. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 189–199

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eisalo A, Manninen V, Mälkönen M, Kuhlbäck B (1976) Hypolipidemic action of gemfibrozil in adult nephrotics. Proc R Soc Med 69 [Suppl 2]:47–48

    Google Scholar 

  4. Frick MH et al. (1987) Helsinki Heart Study: primary prevention trial with gemfibrozil in middle-aged men with dyslipidemia. N Engl J Med 317:1237–1245

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gibaldi M, Perrier D (1982) Pharmacokinetics. Second Edition, Marcel Dekker, New York, p 409

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harvey SC (1980) Gastric antacids and digestants. In: Goodman LS, Gilman A (eds) The pharmacological basis of therapeutics, 6th edn. Macmillan, New York Toronto London, pp 988–1001

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hengy H, Kölle EU (1985) Assay of gemfibrozil in plasma by high performance liquid chromatography. Arzneimittelforschung/Drug Res 35 (II): 1637–1639

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jain AK, Ryan JR, Lacorte WSJ (1981) Clinical evaluation of gemfibrozil, a new antilipidemic agent. Clin Pharmacol Ther 29 (2): 254–255

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kaukola S, Manninen V, Mälkönen M, Enholm C (1981) Gemfibrozil in the treatment of dyslipidaemias in middleage male survivors of myocardial infarction. Acta Med Scand 209:69–73

    Google Scholar 

  10. Knauf H, Spahn H, Mutschier E (1989) Increased urinary excretion of diuretics in hepatitis patients. In: Puschet JB, Greenberg A (eds) Diuretics. Elsevier, New York Amsterdam London, pp 75–78

    Google Scholar 

  11. Manninen V, Mälkönen M (1982) Gemfibrozil treatment of dyslipidaemias in renal failure with uremia or in the nephrotic syndrome. Res Clin Forums 4:113–118

    Google Scholar 

  12. Manninen V, Mälkönen M, Eisalo A (1980) Is gemfibrozil safe for patients with renal disease? Abst. VII International Symp. Drugs Affecting Lipid Metab., Milan, p 26

  13. Manninen V, Mälkönen M, Eisalo A, Virtamo J, Toumilehto J, Knusisto P (1982) Gemfibrozil in the treatment of dyslipidemia: a five-year follow-up study. Acta Med Scand (Suppl) 668:82–87

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mutschler E, Gilfrich HJ, Knauf H (1983) Pharmacokinetics of triamterene in healthy volunteers and patients with liver and kidney disease. Klin Wochenschr 61:883–891

    Google Scholar 

  15. Oberholm RA, Keeley FJ, Peterson FE, Glazko AJ (1976) The metabolism of gemfibrozil. Proc R Soc Med 69 [Suppl 2]: 11–14

    Google Scholar 

  16. Peabody HD Jr (1981) The treatment of primary hyperlipoproteinemia and coronary artery disease. The atherogenic connection. AV/MD Marketing Snc., 40 New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Randinitis EJ, Kinkel AW, Nelson C, Parker TD (1984) Gas chromatographic determination of gemfibrozil and its metabolites in plasma and urine. J Chromatogr Biomed Appl 307:210–215

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rollins DE, Klaassen CD (1979) Biliary excretion of drugs in man. Clin Pharmacokin 4:368–379

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sachs L (1984) Statistische Auswertungsmethoden. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, S 410

    Google Scholar 

  20. Samuel P (1984) Efficacy of gemfibrozil as a lipid regulator in a patient population in the United States. Vascular Medicine. J Clin Angiol 2:8–15

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schwandt P, Weisweiler P, Neureuther G (1979) Serum lipidprotein lipids after gemfibrozil treatment. Artery 5:117–124

    Google Scholar 

  22. Silbernagel S (1985) Amino acids and oligopeptides. In: Seldin DW, Giebisch G (eds) The Kidney: physiology and pathophysiology. Raven Press, New York, pp 1677–1701

    Google Scholar 

  23. Smith TC (1976) Toleration and biovailability of gemfibrozil in healthy men. Proc R Soc Med 69 [Suppl 2]:24–27

    Google Scholar 

  24. Spahn H, Reuter K, Mutschier E, Gerok W, Knauf H (1987) Amiloride pharmacokinetics in renal and hepatic disease. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 33:493–498

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ullrich KJ, Rumrich G (1988) Contraluminal transport systems in the proximal renal tubule involved in secretion of organic anions. Am J Physiol 254:F453-F462

    Google Scholar 

  26. Van Dyke RW (1989) Mechanisms of digestion and absorption of food. In: Sleisenger MH, Fordtran JS (eds) Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1062–1088

    Google Scholar 

  27. Weiner IM (1985) Organic acids and bases and uric acid. In: Seldin DW, Giebisch G (eds) The Kidney: physiology and pathophysiology. Raven Press, New York, pp 1703–1724

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The paper is gratefully dedicated to G.W. Löhr

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knauf, H., Kölle, E.U. & Mutschler, E. Gemfibrozil absorption and elimination in kidney and liver disease. Klin Wochenschr 68, 692–698 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01667018

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01667018

Key words

Navigation