Skip to main content
Log in

Convergence of direct and indirect pharmacodynamic response models

  • Response
  • Published:
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. D. Verotta and Lewis B. Sheiner. A general conceptual model for non-steady state pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 23: 1–4 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. N. L. Dayneka, V. Garg, and W. J. Jusko. Comparison of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 21:457–478 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. E. V. Mishina and W. J. Jusko. Inhibition of rat splenocyte proliferation with methylprednisolone: In vivo effect of liposomal formulation.Pharm. Res. 11:848–854 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. A. I. Nichols, F. D. Boudinot, and W. J. Jusko. Second generation model for prednisolone pharmacodynamics in the rat.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 17:209–227 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. w. J. Jusko and H. C. Ko. Physiologic response models characterize diverse types of pharmacodynamic effects.Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 56:406–419 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. W. F. Ebling, E. N. Lee, and D. R. Stanski. Understanding pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics through computer simulation: I. The comparative clinical profiles of fentanyl and alfentanil.Anesthesiology 72:650–658 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jusko, W.J., Ko, H.C. & Ebling, W.F. Convergence of direct and indirect pharmacodynamic response models. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 23, 5–8 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02353781

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02353781

Keywords

Navigation