Clindamycin-primaquine versus pentamidine for the second-line treatment of pneumocystis pneumonia

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10156-009-0710-ZGet rights and content

Abstract

There are limited data on the efficacy of alternative regimens for treating patients with pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP). We compared the efficacy of clindamycin-primaquine (C-P) with that of pentamidine as a secondline treatment for PCP. Among 91 patients receiving trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) as a first-line treatment for PCP, 31 (34%) did not respond and 7 (8%) had adverse reactions. Fourteen patients received C-P and 9 received pentamidine as a second-line regimen because of treatment failure or an adverse reaction to TMP-SMX. The response rate of patients to C-P was higher than the response rate to pentamidine (9/14; 64% vs 1/9; 11%; P = 0.03).

References (10)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (19)

  • Safety and efficacy of reduced-dose pentamidine as second-line treatment for HIV-related pneumocystis pneumonia

    2020, Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
    Citation Excerpt :

    Currently, some salvage therapies for the treatment of HIV-PCP such as clindamycin plus primaquine (C–P) and atovaquone have been recommended. Kim et al. reported that the response rate of C–P was higher than those of PM (64% vs 11%) [9], and Jannik et al. reported second-line PM showed a greater risk of death (HR = 3.3, 95% C.I 2.2–5.0) [10]. Additionally, Raymond et al. mentioned that the efficacy of salvage of C–P, atovaquone, and PM were 88%, 80%, and 39%, respectively [11].

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text