Elsevier

Biochemical Pharmacology

Volume 35, Issue 16, 15 August 1986, Pages 2757-2761
Biochemical Pharmacology

Metoprolol oxidation by rat liver microsomes: Inhibition by debrisoquine and other drugs

https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-2952(86)90186-3Get rights and content

Abstract

The oxidative metabolism of metoprolol has been shown to display genetic polymorphism of the debrisoquine-type. The use of in vitro inhibition studies has been proposed as a means of denning whether one or more forms of cytochrome P-450 are involved in the rnonogenically-controlled metabolism of two substrates. We have, therefore, tested the ability of debrisoquine and other substrates to inhibit the oxidation of metoprolol by rat liver microsomes. Debrisoquine and guanoxan were potent competitive inhibitors of the α-hydroxylation and O-desmethylation of metoprolol as well as its metabolism by all routes (measured by substrate disappearance). Cimetidine and ranitidine, drugs which are known to impair the clearance of metoprolol in man, showed an inhibitory action comparable to that of debrisoquine in rat liver microsomes. Antipyrine, a compound whose metabolism is not impaired in poor metabolisers of debrisoquine, was found to be only a weak inhibitor of the metabolism of metoprolol. These findings suggest that the oxidation of metoprolol is linked closely to that of debrisoquine, cimetidine and ranitidine but not to that of antipyrine in the rat.

References (39)

  • A.R. Boobis et al.

    Biochem. Pharmac.

    (1985)
  • G.T. Tucker et al.

    Lancet

    (1977)
  • O.H. Lowry et al.

    J. biol. Chem.

    (1951)
  • M.S. Lennard

    J. Chromatogr.

    (1985)
  • A. Kupfer et al.

    Biochem. Pharmac.

    (1982)
  • S.V. Otton et al.

    Life Sci.

    (1984)
  • C. von Bahr et al.

    Biochem. Pharmac.

    (1985)
  • O. Pelkonen et al.

    Biochem. Pharmac.

    (1980)
  • P.E.B. Reilly et al.

    Biochem. Pharmac.

    (1983)
  • P.E.B. Reilly et al.

    Biochem. Pharmac.

    (1984)
  • J.C. Jensen et al.

    Biochem. Pharmac.

    (1985)
  • S.V. Otton et al.

    Life Sci.

    (1983)
  • M.S. Lennard et al.

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (1982)
  • J.C. McGourty et al.

    Br. J. clin. Pharmac.

    (1985)
  • D.S. Davies et al.

    Br. J. clin. Pharmac.

    (1981)
  • A.R. Boobis et al.

    Molec. Pharmac.

    (1983)
  • M. Eichelbaum et al.

    Clin. Pharmac. Ther.

    (1982)
  • T.P. Sloan et al.

    Br. Med. J.

    (1978)
  • N.S. Gates et al.

    Clin. Pharmac. Ther.

    (1982)
  • Cited by (22)

    • Application of substrate depletion assay for early prediction of nonlinear pharmacokinetics in drug discovery: Assessment of nonlinearity of metoprolol, timolol, and propranolol

      2005, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      In this paper, we validated the depletion assay by comparing Km and the maximum metabolic intrinsic clearance (CLint) obtained from the substrate depletion assay with relevant data reported in the metabolite formation assay. For this purpose, we employed propranolol and metoprolol (a β-adrenoceptor antagonist) that are subject to multiple and/or sequential biotransformations,14−17 and nisoldipine (a calcium channel blocker), which shows a more complex biotransformation.18,19 Furthermore, we investigated the usefulness of the depletion assay for predicting nonlinearities of metoprolol, timolol, and propranolol, which exhibited a marginal, moderate, and large nonlinear pharmacokinetics after oral administrations in rats, respectively.

    • Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of metoprolol and propranolol in the female DA and female Wistar rat: The female DA rat is not always an animal model for poor metabolizers of CYP2D6

      2005, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although glucuronidation of propranolol has been identified as one of the metabolic pathways in humans,17 this biotransformation appears to be a minor pathway in rats because no glucuronide was detected in preliminary incubations using freshly isolated rat hepatocytes (data not shown). For metoprolol, two main metabolic pathways, α-hydroxylation and O-desmethylation, have been shown to be inhibited by debrisoquine in a competitive manner,31 and these results and our data regarding the inhibition of metoprolol metabolism by quinine are consistent. Although CYP2D was the major isoform responsible for the overall metabolic pathways of metoprolol and propranolol, oral application of propranolol yielded a notable strain difference.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text