Minireview
Techniques for pharmacological and toxicological studies with isolated hepatocyte suspensions

https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3205(92)90212-8Get rights and content

Abstract

Since its introduction in 1969, the high-yield preparation of isolated hepatocytes has become a frequently used tool for the study of hepatic uptake, excretion, metabolism and toxicity of drugs and other xenobiotics. Basic preparative methods are now firmly established involving perfusion of the liver with a balanced-saline solution containing collagenase. Satisfactory procedures are available for determining cell yields, for expressing cellular activities and for establishing optimal incubation conditions. Gross cellular damage can be detected by means of trypan blue or by measuring enzyme leakage, and damaged cells can be removed from the preparation. Specialized techniques are available for preparing hepatocyte couplets and suspensions enriched with periportal or perivenous hepatocytes.

The isolated hepatocyte preparation is particularly convenient for the study of the kinetics of hepatic drug uptake and excretion because the cells can be rapidly separated from the incubation medium. Isolated liver cells have also proved valuable for investigating drug metabolism since they show many of the features of the intact liver. However, they also show important differences such as losses of membrane specialization, some degree of cell polarity and the capacity to form bile. The many consequences of the hepatic toxicity of xenobiotics including lipid peroxidation, free radical formation, glutathione depletion, and covalent binding to macromolecules are also readily studied with the isolated liver cell preparation. A particular advantage is the ease with which morphological changes as a result of drug exposure can be observed in isolated hepatocytes. However, it must be remembered that the isolation procedure inevitably introduces changes that may make the cells more susceptible than the normal liver to damage by xenobiotic agents. Despite its limitations, the isolated hepatocyte preparation is now firmly established in the armamentarium of the investigator examining the interaction of the liver with xenobiotics.

References (237)

  • P.O. Seglen

    Methods Cell Biol.

    (1976)
  • A.J. Paine

    Chem. Biol. Interact.

    (1990)
  • V. Rogiers et al.

    Biochem. Pharmacol.

    (1990)
  • O. Barnabei et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1974)
  • P.O. Seglen

    Exp. Cell Res.

    (1972)
  • D.N. Wheatley

    Exp. Cell Res.

    (1972)
  • H.J. Phillips

    Tissue Culture

  • C.A. Tyson et al.

    The Isolated Hepatocyte

  • J.P. Mapes et al.

    FEBS Lett.

    (1975)
  • R.A. Jorgenson et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1980)
  • B.P. Hughes et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1987)
  • D.L. Story et al.

    Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.

    (1979)
  • M.N. Berry et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1988)
  • E.-M. Suolinna et al.

    Biochem. Pharmacol.

    (1989)
  • H. De Groot et al.

    Arch. Biochem. Biophys.

    (1988)
  • A. Blom et al.

    Biochem. Pharmacol.

    (1982)
  • C.F.A. Van Bezooijen et al.

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (1976)
  • M.W. Fariss et al.

    Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.

    (1985)
  • N.W. Cornell

    Anal. Biochem.

    (1980)
  • M.J. Meredith et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1982)
  • K. Ziegler et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1988)
  • K. Ziegler et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1986)
  • N.H. Stacey et al.

    Gastroenterology

    (1988)
  • K.D. Kroncke et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1986)
  • R.J. Vonk et al.

    Biochem. Pharmacol.

    (1978)
  • M.H. De Vries et al.

    Biochem. Pharmacol.

    (1985)
  • D.P. Jones et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1978)
  • T.Y. Aw et al.

    Biochem. Pharmacol.

    (1991)
  • G.M. Adamson et al.

    Biochem. Pharmacol.

    (1989)
  • D.W. Sundheimer et al.

    Life Sci.

    (1984)
  • M.H. Grant et al.

    Biochem. Pharmacol.

    (1987)
  • G. Fabre et al.

    Biochem. Pharmacol.

    (1988)
  • M.N. Berry et al.

    J. Cell Biol.

    (1969)
  • J.L. Boyer et al.

    Methods Enzymol.

    (1990)
  • H. Vaananen et al.

    Liver

    (1983)
  • B. Quistorff et al.

    Acta Pharmacol. Toxicol.

    (1984)
  • A. Guillouzo
  • A.E. Sirica et al.

    Pharmacol. Rev.

    (1980)
  • C. Guguen-Guillouzo et al.

    Xenobiotica

    (1988)
  • D.J. Waxman et al.

    Biochem. J.

    (1990)
  • E.G. Schuetz et al.

    J. Cell Physiol.

    (1988)
  • W.J. Lindblad et al.

    Hepatology

    (1991)
  • M.N. Berry et al.

    Isolated Hepatocytes Preparation, Properties and Applications

    (1991)
  • M.T. Donato et al.

    Cell Biol. and Toxicol.

    (1991)
  • M.J. Meredith

    Cell Biol. Toxicol.

    (1988)
  • P. Kremers
  • M.N. Berry et al.
  • S.R. Wang et al.
  • H. Baur et al.

    Hoppe Seyler's Z. Physiol. Chem.

    (1975)
  • H.-A. Kolb et al.

    J. Membr. Biol.

    (1976)
  • Cited by (83)

    • Protective function on liver and proteomic analysis of the improvement mechanism of Sedum sarmentosum Bunge extract on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Nile tilapia

      2021, Aquaculture
      Citation Excerpt :

      In humans and mice, many biochemical parameters have been found to be altered in NAFLD including pathological indexes, enzymic markers, inflammatory regulators and factors (Berry et al., 1992; Pawlak et al., 2015). Previous studies have demonstrated that the expression levels of lipid metabolism-related proteins (FAS and L-FABP), lipid metabolites (FFA and TG), and linoleic acid are altered in NAFLD (Berry et al., 1992; Wu et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2015; Xie et al., 2016). These factors participate in lipid synthesis, storage, transport and catabolism; and are regulated by multiple transcription factors including PPARs, X receptors, and cAMP response element-binding protein (Anderson et al., 2004; Calkin and Tontonoz, 2012; Zhang et al., 2012).

    • Hepatoprotective and antioxidant effects of dietary Glycyrrhiza polysaccharide against TCDD-induced hepatic injury and RT-PCR quantification of AHR2, ARNT2, CYP1A mRNA in Jian Carp (Cyprinus carpio var. Jian)

      2017, Journal of Environmental Sciences (China)
      Citation Excerpt :

      The activity and leakage of cytosolic enzymes (GOT, GPT, AKP, LDH) have frequently been used to assess liver toxicity caused by chemical drugs (Fouzy et al., 2007; Turkez et al., 2016). GPT, GOT and LDH, the soluble enzymes, were found to be released from the cytoplasm of liver cells (Berry et al., 1992; Mitra et al., 1998; Romero et al., 1998), and their activities have been considered as classical indicators of liver or hepatocyte injury (Kalaiselvan et al., 2016; Turkez et al., 2016). Alkaline phosphatase (AKP) is an isoenzyme and widely distributed in the liver.

    • Effects of curcumin on antioxidative activities and cytokine production in Jian carp (Cyprinuscarpio var. Jian) with CCl<inf>4</inf>-induced liver damage

      2015, Fish and Shellfish Immunology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The expression of IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-12 mRNAs was also significantly increased after CCl4 treatment (P < 0.01; Fig. 7A–C), whereas the expression of IL-1β and TNF-α mRNAs in the liver was significantly reduced in the carp fed 0.5% and 1.0% curcumin for 60 days and then treated with CCl4 compared with those treated with CCl4 alone (P < 0.05; Fig. 7A,B) and IL-12 mRNA expression in the liver was significantly reduced after CCl4 treatment in the carp fed with any dose of curcumin (P < 0.05; Fig. 7C). It has been demonstrated that CCl3O2·, the metabolite of CCl4, causes lipid peroxidation, blocking the production of membrane proteins and resulting in the exudation of soluble cytoplasmic enzymes and increased serum GOT, GPT, and LDH [25]. In this study, 0.5% and 1.0% curcumin significantly inhibited the increased serum GOT levels induced by CCl4 in Jian carp, and 1.0% curcumin markedly suppressed the increases in serum GPT and LDH induced by CCl4.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text