Elsevier

Toxicology

Volume 111, Issues 1–3, 17 July 1996, Pages 15-20
Toxicology

Kids are different: developmental variability in toxicology

https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-483X(96)03389-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Data on the impact of many environmental compounds to human health is often lacking, particularly when considering the risk to the unborn and developing child. The stage of development of the individual at the time of exposure to a toxicant has not always been considered. For example, a higher percentage of ingested lead is absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract of infants than adults. Renal elimination also follows a developmental pattern, being very limited during the newborn period, increasing during infancy and childhood, and declining gradually after puberty. Genetic polymorphisms in metabolic enzyme activity add another dimension of variability. Depending on the particular chemical, this may serve as a protective factor or increase susceptibility to toxic effects (e.g. epoxide hydrolase and fetal hydantoin syndrome). Children also have distinctive behaviors and target organ susceptibilities that warrant special consideration. The consequences of developmental changes are well-known in medical practice, and many drug doses are modified based on age, liver, and renal function, and other factors that may influence pharmacokinetic behavior of drugs. There is a sizable body of such information available, in part, in the pediatric and clinical pharmacology and toxicology literature. The concept of the significance of developmental stage is becoming increasingly important in toxicological risk assessment as well.

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (30)

  • Trace elements in children with autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analysis based on case-control studies

    2021, Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology
    Citation Excerpt :

    A previous study has shown that humans are sensitive to the toxicity of heavy metals in the environment, and children are more susceptible to the toxicity of heavy metals than adults. Meanwhile, the proportion of Pb absorbed by young children through the gastrointestinal tract is higher than that of adults [43]. An epidemiological study in the United States found that per thousand kilograms of Hg pollution increased the incidence of autism by 61 % [44].

  • Short-term effects of a perinatal exposure to a 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon mixture in rats: Assessment of early motor and sensorial development and cerebral cytochrome oxidase activity in pups

    2014, NeuroToxicology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Within these populations, young children are more vulnerable to the adverse effects of contaminants due to particularities of physiology and ways of interaction with the environment during the early phase of development (Landrigan et al., 2002; Sly and Flack, 2008). Actually, children breath more air and need more calories per body weight than adults, leading them to be exposed to proportionally higher amounts of contaminants (Graeter and Mortensen, 1996; Sly and Flack, 2008; Weiss and Landrigan, 2000). Furthermore, the increased sensitivity of the central nervous system to environmental agents during the early stages of development compared to the mature brain is currently well recognized (Landrigan et al., 2005; Miodovnik, 2011; Tilson et al., 1998).

  • Identifying important life stages for monitoring and assessing risks from exposures to environmental contaminants: Results of a World Health Organization review

    2014, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Table 1 illustrates different aspects of toxic substance exposure as described by Sexton et al. (1995). Again, the focus on children or childhood is highlighted in this paper because of their potential vulnerabilities (Bruckner, 2000; Graeter and Mortensen, 1996; Makri et al., 2004; Schwenk et al., 2003; Walker, 2005). “Although there is no single ‘correct’ set of age groups, adopting a common convention for defining age groups will enable scientists to better understand differences in exposure and risk across life stages and the factors that may account for such differences, such as nutritional status, prevalence of certain diseases, ethnic/cultural norms regarding activity or behavior patterns, population genetic characteristics, meteorological conditions, geography, and social stress” (Firestone, 2010).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text