Structural basis for ligand recognition by integrins

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2007.09.002Get rights and content

Integrins, the major cell surface receptors mediating cell–extracellular matrix (ECM) adhesion, are central to the basic physiology underlying all multicellular organisms. As the complexity of animal body architecture increased, integrins were forced to acquire recognition capabilities toward the wide variety of ECM ligands and cell surface counter-receptors that emerged during evolution. Structural determination of the integrin–ligand complexes for both I domain-containing and non-I domain-containing integrins revealed two fundamentally different types of integrin-binding surfaces. In addition, recent advances in the biochemical and pharmacological characterization of the integrin–ligand interactions are beginning to reveal how integrins achieve specific recognition of wide variety of ligands using a small binding cleft at the subunit interface common to all integrins.

Introduction

Integrins are heterodimeric adhesion receptors composed of α and β subunits that link ECM to the cytoskeleton. Although they can be found in simple metazoan organisms such as sponges and corals [1], their numbers and variety have greatly expanded throughout the course of evolution. Humans have 18 α and 8 β subunits, assembled into 24 distinct heterodimers. Multiple α subunits can combine with single β subunits (and vice versa), giving rise to ‘combinatorial’ ligand specificity. The need to gain a mechanistic understanding of the ligand recognition exercised by integrins remains paramount, since basic cellular events such as cell adhesion, cell migration, anchorage-dependent cell survival, and cell–cell communication depend heavily on this type of molecular interaction. Integrins are also the focus of extensive clinical research, because of their crucial involvement in numerous disease states. However, the extent to which we understand the structural basis for these interaction varies among different integrin–ligand pairs, because of the limited number of high-resolution crystal structures thus far determined (Table 1). There are only five independent integrin–ligand complex structures available: three are for I domain integrins and two are for β3 integrins. The vast majority of integrin heterodimers, particularly those of β1 class, have not been crystallized, even in their apo-form. Although direct structural determination is the most straightforward way to gain insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying recognition, recent advances in the biochemical characterization of integrin–ligand interactions using purified recombinant proteins (as opposed to more conventional cell adhesion assays) have contributed to unraveling some of the unexpected binding modes used by certain integrin–ligand pairs. Efforts to develop ligand mimetic compounds that target therapeutic intervention have also provided structural insights into the ligand-binding pocket of integrins. A rich body of these biochemical and pharmacological studies can therefore be combined with the structures determined thus far to increase our mechanistic understanding of these interactions. In this review, I will focus on the general structure and specificity of ligand recognition as revealed by crystal structures and other recent biochemical findings on integrin–ligand interactions. For a detailed overview of integrin ectodomain structure and its conformational variations, readers are referred to a recent review by Luo and Springer [2], as well as one by Arnaout in this volume.

Section snippets

Integrin MIDAS  the crucial importance of metal coordination in integrin–ligand interactions

The most important integrin domain in ligand recognition is the I (inserted) domain [3]. Two types of I domains can be found in integrins: one is the αI domain, present in approximately half of all α subunits; the other is the βI domain, present in ALL β subunits. Therefore, some integrins (e.g. αLβ2) have two I domains (αI and βI), whereas others (e.g. αVβ3) have only one (βI). I domains assume an α/β dinucleotide-binding fold and house, at their apex, a metal-binding site known as the

Ligand recognition by α MIDAS

Collagens, a major family of structural ECM proteins, are characterized by the presence of triple helical regions, with cells employing four different integrins (i.e. α1, α2, α10, and α11) to maintain holds with them. In the α2 I domain-collagen triple helical peptide structure [11], the stiff collagen rod docks onto a shallow trench on top of the I domain, with MIDAS situated at the center, coordinated by a glutamate residue of collagen. This trench-like feature is also found in the apo-form

Ligand recognition by β MIDAS: RGD-type ligands

Although the RGD motif was originally discovered in fibronectin, the list of RGD motif-containing integrin–ligands quickly expanded and has continued to grow in recent years [17, 18, 19, 20, 21]. Accordingly, RGD-binding integrins constitute the largest subgroup. The essential recognition mechanism common to this class of integrins was explicitly revealed by the structures of the αVβ3 ectodomain in complex with the cyclic RGD peptide [22], as well as another RGD-type integrin (αIIbβ3) complexed

Non-RGD ligands and the interplay between α MIDAS and β MIDAS

Although no structure has thus far been determined for non-RGD ligands in complex with non-αI domain integrins, the structure of the α4 integrin-binding region of the two IgSF counter-receptors VCAM-1 and MAdCAM-1 are available [32, 33, 34, 35]. The recognition motif is present in the C–D loop of the most N-terminal Ig domain, which corresponds to the segment where crucial Glu residue is present in ICAM-1 and ICAM-3. However, the Asp carboxylates of VCAM-1 and MAdCAM-1 are located at the very

Laminin recognition by integrins

Despite being one of the evolutionally oldest and most fundamental cell adhesion components, the laminin–integrin interaction has remained elusive to biochemical and structural characterization. Laminins are major basement membrane proteins composed of three different polypeptide chains, termed α, β, and γ. Till date, five α, three β, and three γ chains are known to make up at least 15 isoforms of heterotrimeric laminins in mammals [45]. This structural complexity, as well as the technical

Conclusions

Structural analyses of integrin αI domains in complex with protein ligands have revealed them to be specially equipped for recognizing a ‘surface exposed’ ligand surface. In contrast, structural, biochemical, and pharmacological studies have predicted that evolutionally more conserved non-αI-domain integrins contain well-shaped ligand-binding pocket at the α–β subunit interface, suitable for recognizing ‘loop presented’ ligands. Such wells are not particularly deep, enabling easy access for

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful to Dr Motomu Shimaoka for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was partly supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (MEXT).

References (51)

  • F. Curnis et al.

    Spontaneous formation of l-isoaspartate and gain of function in fibronectin

    J Biol Chem

    (2006)
  • S. Takahashi et al.

    The RGD motif in fibronectin is essential for mouse development but dispensable for fibronectin fibril assembly

    J Cell Biol

    (2007)
  • S.S. Lee et al.

    Structure of the integrin binding fragment from fibrillin-1 gives new insights into microfibril organization

    Structure (Camb)

    (2004)
  • J.H. Wang et al.

    The crystal structure of an N-terminal two-domain fragment of vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1): a cyclic peptide based on the domain 1 C–D loop can inhibit VCAM-1-alpha 4 integrin interaction

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (1995)
  • P. Taylor et al.

    A new conformation of the integrin-binding fragment of human VCAM-1 crystallizes in a highly hydrated packing arrangement

    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr

    (2001)
  • E.Y. Jones et al.

    Crystal structure of an integrin-binding fragment of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 at 1.8 Å resolution

    Nature

    (1995)
  • Y. Kariya et al.

    Efficient expression system of human recombinant laminin-5

    J Biochem (Tokyo)

    (2002)
  • R. Nishiuchi et al.

    Ligand-binding specificities of laminin-binding integrins: a comprehensive survey of laminin–integrin interactions using recombinant alpha3beta1, alpha6beta1, alpha7beta1 and alpha6beta4 integrins

    Matrix Biol

    (2006)
  • S.A. Nichols et al.

    Early evolution of animal cell signaling and adhesion genes

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2006)
  • J. Takagi et al.

    Structure of integrin alpha5beta1 in complex with fibronectin

    EMBO J

    (2003)
  • R.O. Hynes et al.

    The evolution of cell adhesion

    J Cell Biol

    (2000)
  • J.O. Lee et al.

    Two conformations of the integrin A-domain (I-domain): a pathway for activation?

    Structure

    (1995)
  • M.N. Fodje et al.

    Interplay between an AAA module and an integrin I domain may regulate the function of magnesium chelatase

    J Mol Biol

    (2001)
  • J. Emsley et al.

    Structural basis of collagen recognition by integrin alpha2beta1

    Cell

    (2000)
  • M. Shimaoka et al.

    Structures of the αL I domain and its complex with ICAM-1 reveal a shape-shifting pathway for integrin regulation

    Cell

    (2003)
  • Cited by (99)

    • Identification of proteins and N-glycosylation sites of knee cartilage in Kashin-Beck disease compared with osteoarthritis

      2022, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
      Citation Excerpt :

      ITGB1 can bind to 12 different α subunits (α1-11, αV) thereby obtaining a variety of ligand specificities [22]. The specificity of many integrins is dependent on the alpha subunits and, thus influences the effects on the cellular behavior [23]. ITGB1 is critical for the structure, function and development of cartilage.

    • Cryo-EM Reveals Integrin-Mediated TGF-β Activation without Release from Latent TGF-β

      2020, Cell
      Citation Excerpt :

      The ArgRGD interacts with the side chain of αv D218. The AspRGD, together with S114 and S116 of the SDL1 α1 helix, coordinate the metal ion-dependent adhesion site (MIDAS) cation consistent with other αv integrins in complex with RGD (Figures S3J–S3M) (Takagi, 2007). In our previous ligand-free structure of αvβ8, we found that SDL2 was flexible and therefore could not be modeled (Cormier et al., 2018).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text