Associate editor: Ken-Ichi Inui
Drug interactions at the blood-brain barrier: Fact or fantasy?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2009.03.017Get rights and content

Abstract

There is considerable interest in the therapeutic and adverse outcomes of drug interactions at the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCSFB). These include altered efficacy of drugs used in the treatment of CNS disorders, such as AIDS dementia and malignant tumors, and enhanced neurotoxicity of drugs that normally penetrate poorly into the brain. BBB- and BCSFB-mediated interactions are possible because these interfaces are not only passive anatomical barriers, but are also dynamic in that they express a variety of influx and efflux transporters and drug metabolizing enzymes. Based on studies in rodents, it has been widely postulated that efflux transporters play an important role at the human BBB in terms of drug delivery. Furthermore, it is assumed that chemical inhibition of transporters or their genetic ablation in rodents is predictive of the magnitude of interaction to be expected at the human BBB. However, studies in humans challenge this well-established paradigm and claim that such drug interactions will be lesser in magnitude but yet may be clinically significant. This review focuses on current known mechanisms of drug interactions at the blood-brain and blood-CSF barriers and the potential impact of such interactions in humans. We also explore whether such drug interactions can be predicted from preclinical studies. Defining the mechanisms and the impact of drug–drug interactions at the BBB is important for improving efficacy of drugs used in the treatment of CNS disorders while minimizing their toxicity as well as minimizing neurotoxicity of non-CNS drugs.

Introduction

Drug–drug interactions (DDIs) have long been recognized as an important cause of alteration in drug efficacy or adverse drug effects (or toxicity), particularly for drugs that have a narrow therapeutic window. Much of the work on DDIs has been focused on changes in absorption, bioavailability or systemic concentration of the drug (Levy et al., 2000). However, it has been increasingly recognized that DDIs can affect the distribution of drugs into a particular compartment (e.g. CNS) with or without affecting their systemic plasma (or blood) concentration. Furthermore, DDIs can result in CNS effects of medications that normally are not targeted to the brain (Endres et al., 2006).

DDIs that involve the CNS can result from 1) changes in plasma concentrations (unbound or total) of at least one of the interacting drugs (pharmacokinetic interactions), 2) changes in drug's effects at target sites or its disposition within the CNS (pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions, respectively), or a combination of the two (Table 1). A third source for altered effects of drugs on the CNS resides in the interfaces between plasma and the CNS, namely the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCSFB). By modulating BBB or BCSFB function, a drug can affect the distribution of another drug into the brain, its removal from the brain, or both. In this case, the plasma concentration of the affected drug often remains unchanged, especially when only a small fraction of the dose distributes into the brain. To distinguish between barrier-mediated interactions and those caused by other mechanisms, the concentration of the affected drug should be measured in the CNS, in the presence and the absence of the precipitant drug. In the clinical setting, however, brain concentrations are normally not measured due to technical and ethical reasons. Thus, BBB-based interactions may be overlooked or confused with pharmacodynamic interactions. From the clinical point of view, DDIs that seem to be unexpected could potentially be prevented if their mechanisms are correctly identified.

The aim of this review is to present an overview of currently known mechanisms of drug interactions at blood–brain interfaces and the potential impact of such interactions on CNS drug disposition and effects. Particularly, we will focus on transporter-mediated DDIs. Most of the existing knowledge on DDIs at the BBB is based on studies in animal models, but few clinical studies and case reports are also available. In vitro studies are beyond the scope of this review, but general principles for prediction of DDIs at the human BBB from in vitro studies as well as from studies in animal models are presented. Detailed discussion of BBB structure and function and methodologies for evaluation of brain penetration of drugs are available elsewhere (Langer and Müller, 2004, Redzic and Segal, 2004, Shen et al., 2004, Hawkins and Davis, 2005, Endres et al., 2006, Nicolazzo et al., 2006, Cecchelli et al., 2007, Upton, 2007, Liu et al., 2008).

Section snippets

Drug transfer across blood-brain barriers

The BBB and the BCSFB are formed by brain endothelial cells and choroid plexus (CP) epithelial cells, respectively. Over the past few years it has been demonstrated that the BBB and the BCSFB are not only anatomical barriers, but also dynamic tissues that express multiple transporters and drug-metabolizing enzymes. Furthermore, brain capillaries are closely associated with perivascular astrocytic end-feet, pericytes, microglia and neuronal processes that regulate BBB permeability and, together

Methodological considerations

The impact of drug interactions described in the following section has been assessed by the use of pharmacodynamic outcomes (drug effects), pharmacokinetic outcomes (drug concentrations), or both. Further information on the type of interaction can be gained by measuring the unbound drug concentrations in plasma and brain. The general scientific consensus is that under normal conditions (BBB that is not leaky or disrupted), only unbound drug can be transferred across the BBB. Thus, an

Predictions of drug interactions at the human blood-brain barrier

The important role that P-gp plays in pharmacokinetic drug interactions has been recognized in a recent draft guidance document on the study of DDIs that was developed by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (available at http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/6695dft.pdf). This draft states that P-gp “may be appropriate to evaluate during drug development”. Many pharmaceutical companies will preclude development of P-gp substrate drug candidates, particularly if the drug is intended for the

Conclusions

Although DDIs at the blood–brain interfaces can theoretically occur through several mechanisms, the majority of data on such drug interactions involve the ABC efflux transporters, in particular P-gp. Based on studies in rodents, it has been widely postulated that efflux transporters play a vital role at the human BBB in terms of drug delivery and drug interactions. Through PET imaging studies, it is clear that in humans P-gp is important in preventing delivery of drugs to the CNS. However, the

References (338)

  • DauchyS. et al.

    Expression and transcriptional regulation of ABC transporters and cytochromes P450 in hCMEC/D3 human cerebral microvascular endothelial cells

    Biochem Pharmacol

    (2009)
  • de LangeE.

    Potential role of ABC transporters as a detoxification system at the blood-CSF barrier

    Adv Drug Deliv Rev

    (2004)
  • de VriesE. et al.

    Can celecoxib affect P-glycoprotein-mediated drug efflux? A microPET study

    Nucl Med Biol

    (2008)
  • DeguchiY. et al.

    Brain distribution of 6-mercaptopurine is regulated by the efflux transport system in the blood-brain barrier

    Life Sci

    (2000)
  • Del AmoE. et al.

    Pharmacokinetic role of L-type amino acid transporters LAT1 and LAT2

    Eur J Pharm Sci

    (2008)
  • DesrayaudS. et al.

    Effect of the P-glycoprotein inhibitor, SDZ PSC 833, on the blood and brain pharmacokinetics of colchicine

    Life Sci

    (1997)
  • EmerichD. et al.

    Central analgesic actions of loperamide following transient permeation of the blood brain barrier with Cereport (RMP-7)

    Brain Res

    (1998)
  • EndresC. et al.

    The role of transporters in drug interactions

    Eur J Pharm Sci

    (2006)
  • FischerW. et al.

    Transport of valproate at intestinal epithelial (Caco-2) and brain endothelial (RBE4) cells: mechanism and substrate specificity

    Eur J Pharm Biopharm

    (2008)
  • AbbottN. et al.

    Astrocyte–endothelial interactions at the blood-brain barrier

    Nat Rev Neurosci

    (2006)
  • AdachiY. et al.

    Comparative studies on in vitro methods for evaluating in vivo function of MDR1 P-glycoprotein

    Pharm Res

    (2001)
  • AdkisonK. et al.

    Uptake of valproic acid into rat brain is mediated by a medium-chain fatty acid transporter

    J Pharmacol Exp Ther

    (1996)
  • AlexanderG. et al.

    Effect of plasma levels of large neutral amino acids and degree of parkinsonism on the blood-to-brain transport of levodopa in naive and MPTP parkinsonian monkeys

    Neurology

    (1994)
  • AndersonB. et al.

    Dependence of nelfinavir brain uptake on dose and tissue concentrations of the selective P-glycoprotein inhibitor zosuquidar in rats

    Drug Metab Dispos

    (2006)
  • AndersonG. et al.

    Where is the evidence that p-glycoprotein limits brain uptake of antiepileptic drug and contributes to drug resistance in epilepsy?

    Epilepsia

    (2007)
  • AnthonypillaiC. et al.

    The distribution of the HIV protease inhibitor, ritonavir, to the brain, cerebrospinal fluid, and choroid plexuses of the guinea pig

    J Pharmacol Exp Ther

    (2004)
  • ArboixM. et al.

    Multidrug resistance-reversing agents increase vinblastine distribution in normal tissues expressing the P-glycoprotein but do not enhance drug penetration in brain and testis

    J Pharmacol Exp Ther

    (1997)
  • AronicaE. et al.

    Expression and cellular distribution of multidrug resistance-related proteins in the hippocampus of patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy

    Epilepsia

    (2004)
  • AwasthiS. et al.

    RLIP76, a non-ABC transporter, and drug resistance in epilepsy

    BMC Neurosci

    (2005)
  • BadagnaniI. et al.

    Interaction of methotrexate with organic-anion transporting polypeptide 1A2 and its genetic variants

    J Pharmacol Exp Ther

    (2006)
  • BaehrC. et al.

    Choroid plexus epithelial monolayers—a cell culture model from porcine brain

    Cerebrospinal Fluid Res

    (2006)
  • BakerS. et al.

    Cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics and penetration of continuous infusion topotecan in children with central nervous system tumors

    Cancer Chemother Pharmacol

    (1996)
  • BankstahlJ. et al.

    Tariquidar-induced P-glycoprotein inhibition at the rat blood-brain barrier studied with (R)-11C-verapamil and PET

    J Nucl Med

    (2008)
  • BarnettP. et al.

    Differential permeability and quantitative MR imaging of a human lung carcinoma brain xenograft in the nude rat

    Am J Pathol

    (1995)
  • Barraud de LagerieS. et al.

    Cerebral uptake of mefloquine enantiomers with and without the P-gp inhibitor elacridar (GF1210918) in mice

    Br J Pharmacol

    (2004)
  • BartJ. et al.

    New positron emission tomography tracer [(11)C]carvedilol reveals P-glycoprotein modulation kinetics

    Br J Pharmacol

    (2005)
  • BauerB. et al.

    Pregnane X receptor up-regulation of P-glycoprotein expression and transport function at the blood-brain barrier

    Mol Pharmacol

    (2004)
  • BauerB. et al.

    Coordinated nuclear receptor regulation of the efflux transporter, Mrp2, and the phase-II metabolizing enzyme, GSTpi, at the blood-brain barrier

    J Cereb Blood Flow Metab

    (2008)
  • BauerB. et al.

    In vivo activation of human pregnane X receptor tightens the blood-brain barrier to methadone through P-glycoprotein up-regulation

    Mol Pharmacol

    (2006)
  • BeaulieuE. et al.

    P-glycoprotein is strongly expressed in the luminal membranes of the endothelium of blood vessels in the brain

    Biochem J

    (1997)
  • BelinskyM. et al.

    Multidrug resistance protein 4 protects bone marrow, thymus, spleen, and intestine from nucleotide analogue-induced damage

    Cancer Res

    (2007)
  • BellavanceM. et al.

    Recent advances in blood-brain barrier disruption as a CNS delivery strategy

    AAPS J

    (2008)
  • BendayanR. et al.

    In situ localization of P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) in human and rat brain

    J Histochem Cytochem

    (2006)
  • BettenD. et al.

    Antidote use in the critically ill poisoned patient

    J Intensive Care Med

    (2006)
  • BhattacharyaI. et al.

    GHB (gamma-hydroxybutyrate) carrier-mediated transport across the blood-brain barrier

    J Pharmacol Exp Ther

    (2004)
  • BhattacharyaI. et al.

    Potential gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) drug interactions through blood-brain barrier transport inhibition: a pharmacokinetic simulation-based evaluation

    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn

    (2006)
  • BihorelS. et al.

    Modulation of the brain distribution of imatinib and its metabolites in mice by valspodar, zosuquidar and elacridar

    Pharm Res

    (2007)
  • BlaneyS. et al.

    Pharmacokinetics of lamivudine and BCH-189 in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid of nonhuman primates

    Antimicrob Agents Chemother

    (1995)
  • BlecharzK. et al.

    Glucocorticoids increase VE-cadherin expression and cause cytoskeletal rearrangements in murine brain endothelial cEND cells

    J Cereb Blood Flow Metab

    (2008)
  • BodeU. et al.

    Active transport of methotrexate from cerebrospinal fluid in humans

    Cancer Res

    (1980)
  • Cited by (164)

    • Focused ultrasound for opening blood-brain barrier and drug delivery monitored with positron emission tomography

      2020, Journal of Controlled Release
      Citation Excerpt :

      Among all the BBB transporters, only P-gp, which is an adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette (ABC) transporter, and glucose transporter 1 (GLUT-1), a carbohydrate transporter, have been assessed with FUS in preclinical studies, as shown in Table 5. Thus, further studies on FUS and its effects on different BBB transporters are needed, especially those that are considered the major drug transporters in the brain, such as transporters of the ABC superfamily and transporters of the solute carrier (SLC) superfamily, including amino acid transporters [54]. PET is a functional imaging modality that provides information on several biological parameters of human organs, including the brain.

    • Fine-tuning bispecific therapeutics

      2020, Pharmacology and Therapeutics
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported in part by NIH grants GM 32165 and AG 031485.

    View full text