Skip to main content
Log in

Species Differences in Stereoselective Hydrolase Activity in Intestinal Mucosa

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. The aim of this study is to investigate species differences in the stereoselective hydrolysis for propranolol ester prodrugs in mammalian intestinal mucosa and Caco-2 cells.

Methods. Hydrolase activities for propranolol prodrugs and p-nitro-phenylacetate in man (age: 51−71 years), the beagle dog (age: 4 years) and Wistar rat (age: 8 weeks) intestinal mucosa, and also in Caco-2 cells (passage between 60−70) were estimated by determining the rate of production of propranolol and p-nitrophenol, respectively.

Results. The hydrolase activities for both propranolol prodrugs and p-nitrophenylacetate were in the order of man > rat >> Caco-2 cells > dog for intestinal microsomes, and rat > Caco-2 cells = man > dog for intestinal cytosol. Dog microsomes showed stereoselective hydrolysis for propranolol prodrugs, but not those from human or rat. Interestingly, both subcellular fractions of Caco-2 cells showed remarkable R-enantioselectivity except acetyl propranolol. Enzyme kinetic experiments for each enantiomer of butyryl propranolol in microsomes revealed that dog possesses both low and high affinity hydrolases. Both Km and Vmax values in rat were largest among examined microsomes, while Vmax/Km was largest in man. Finally, it was shown that the carboxylesterases might contribute to the hydrolysis of propranolol prodrug in all species by inhibition experiments.

Conclusions. The hydrolase activities for propranolol prodrugs and p-nitrophenylacetate in intestinal mucosa showed great species differences and those in human intestine were closer to those of rat intestine than dog intestine or Caco-2 cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. T. Prueksaritanont, L. M. Gorham, J. H. Hochman, L. O. Tran, and K. P. Vyas. Comparative studies of drug-metabolizing enzymes in dog, monkey, and human small intestines, and Caco-2 cells, Drug Metab. Dispos. 24:634–642 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. S. Kaminsky and M. J. Fasco. Small intestinal cytochromes P450, Toxicology 21:407–422 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Lefebvre, W. Homsy, G. Caille, and P. D. Souich. First-pass metabolism of diltiazem in anesthetized rabbit: Role of extrahepatic organs, Pharm. Res. 13:124–128 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. A. Raoof, P. F. Augustijns, and R. K. Verbeek. In vivo assessment of intestinal, hepatic, and pulmonary first pass metabolism of propofol in rat, Pharm. Res. 13:891–895 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Yamashita, M. Yoshida, Y. Taki, T. Sakane, and T. Nadai. Kinetic analysis of the drug permeation process across the intestinal epithelium, Pharm. Res. 11:1646–1651 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Inoue, M. Morikawa, M. Tuboi, T. Yamada, and M. Sugiura. Hydrolysis of ester-type drugs by the purified esterase from human intestinal mucosa, Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 29:17–25 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. Iwamoto, M. Takei, and J. Watanabe. Gastrointestinal and hepatic first pass metabolism of aspirin in rats, J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 34:176–180 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. D. Ribadeneira, B. J. Aungst, C. J. Eyermann, and S. M. Huang. Effects of structural modification on the intestinal permeability of angiotensin II receptor antagonists and the correlation of in vitro, in situ, and in vivo absorption, Pharm. Res. 13:227–233 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  9. T. S. Engelen, V. Delistrie, and Y. J. Schneider, Phase I and II biotransformations in living Caco-2 cells cultivated under serumfree conditions, Biochem. Pharmacol. 46:1393–1401 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Y. Garuceau, I. Davis, and J. Hasegawa. Plasma propranolol levels in beagle dogs after administration of propranolol hemisuccinate ester, J. Pharm. Sci. 67:1360–1363 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Shameen, T. Imai., and M. Otagiri. An in-vitro and in-vivo correlative approach to the evaluation of ester prodrugs to improve oral delivery of propranolol, J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 45:246–252 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. D. Anderson, W. W. Chu, and R. E. Galinsky. Reduction of first-pass metabolism of propranolol after oral administration of ester prodrugs, Int. J. Pharm. 43:261–265 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Shameen, T. Imai, Y. Yoshigae, A. Sparreboom, and M. Otagiri. Stereoselective hydrolysis of O-isovaleryl propranolol and its influence on the clearance of propranolol after oral administration, J. Pharm. Sci. 83:1754–1757 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Yoshigae, T. Imai, A. Horita, and M. Otagiri, Species differences for stereoselective hydrolysis of propranolol prodrugs in plasma and liver, Chirality 9:661–666 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  15. O. H. Lowry, N. J. Rosebrough, A. L. Farr, and R. J. Randall. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent, J. Biol. Chem. 193:264–275 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  16. I. A. M. de Lannoy, F. Barker.III, and K. S. Pang. Formed and preformed metabolite excretion clearance in liver, a metabolite formation organ: Studies on enalapril and enalaprilate in the single-pass and recirculating perfused rat liver, J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 21:395–422 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. K. Yang, Y. Y. Hsieh, W. C. Chang, and J. D. Huang. Enantioselectivity of microsomal and cytosolic esterases in rat intestinal mucosa, Drug Metab. Dispos. 20:719–25 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. L. Mosher, J. McBee, and D. B. Shaw. Esterase activity toward the diastereomers of cefuroxime axetil in the rat and dog, Pharm. Res. 9:687–689 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  19. E. W. Morgan, B. Yan, D. Greenway, and A. Parkinson. Purification and characterization of two rat liver microsomal carboxylesterases (hydrolase A and B), Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 315:495–512 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  20. E. W. Morgan, B. Yan, D. Greenway, and A. Parkinson, Regulation of two rat liver microsomal carboxylesterase isozymes: species differences, tissue distribution, and the effects of age, sex, and xenobiotic treatment of rats, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 315:513–26 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  21. H. Schwer, T. Langmann, R. Daig, A. Becker, C. Aslanidis, and G. Schmitz, Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel putative carboxylesterase, Present in human intestine and liver, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comun. 233:117–120 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Y. Kageyama, Y. Yamazaki, A. S. Afify, Y. Ogawa, T. Okada, and H. Okuno, Stereoselective hydrolysis of xenobiotic esters by different cell lines from rat liver and hepatoma and its application to chiral prodrugs for designated growth suppression of cancer cells, Chirality 7:297–304 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. S. Afify, Y. Yamazaki, Y. Kageyama, S. Yusa, Y. Ogawa, T. Okada, and H. Okuno, Different expression of esterase variants in rat hepatic and hepatoma-derived cell lines detected by electrophoresis, Z. Naturforsch. C. 50:664–8 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yoshigae, Y., Imai, T., Horita, A. et al. Species Differences in Stereoselective Hydrolase Activity in Intestinal Mucosa. Pharm Res 15, 626–631 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011946314416

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011946314416

Navigation