Skip to main content
Log in

Improved Dose Linearity of Cyclosporine Pharmacokinetics from a Microemulsion Formulation

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The pharmacokinetic dose proportionality and relative bioavailability of cyclosporine from a microemulsion formulation (Sandimmune Neoral) were compared to those of the commercial formulation (Sandimmune) over the dosage range 200 to 800 mg. Single oral administrations were given as soft gelatin capsules in an open randomized study with 48 healthy volunteers. Whole-blood cyclosporine concentrations were determined by a specific monoclonal radio-immunoassay. In comparison to Sandimmune, the absorption rate (maximum concentration) and systemic availability (area under the curve) of cyclosporine were greater for Sandimmune Neoral at all dose levels investigated. The area under the curve for Sandimmune increased in a less than proportional manner with respect to dose, whereas that for Sandimmune Neoral was consistent with linear pharmacokinetics. Because of this difference, no global assessment of relative bioavailability could be performed. The relative bioavailability of cyclosporine from Sandimmune Neoral ranged from 174 to 239% compared to Sandimmune, depending on the dose level. The improvements in oral bioavailability and dose linearity of cyclosporine exposure after administration as Sandimmune Neoral should facilitate more accurate dosage titration in the clinical setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. G. C. Yee. Dosage forms of cyclosporine. Pharmacotherapy 11:149S–152S (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. J. Ptachcinski, R. Venkataramanan, and G. J. Burckart. Clinical pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 11:107–132 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. E. Ball, H. Munzer, H. P. Keller, E. Abisch, and J. Rosenthaler. Specific 3H radioimmunoassay with a monoclonal antibody for monitoring cyclosporine in blood. Clin. Chem. 34:257–260 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  4. SAS/STAT (Release 6.04 for Personal Computers), SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, 1988.

  5. RS/1 for VAX and Micro VAX. Release 4.3 Software. Bolt Beranek and Newman (BBN) Software Products Corporation, Cambridge, MA, 1991.

  6. J. P. Reymond, J. L. Steimer, and W. Niederberger. On the dose dependency of cyclosporin A absorption and disposition in healthy volunteers. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm. 16:331–353 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. M. Landaw and J. J. DiStefano. Multiexponential, multicom-partmental, and noncompartmental modeling. II. Data analysis and statistical considerations. Am. J. Physiol. 246:R665–R677 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Herson. Fieller's theorem vs. the delta method for significance intervals for ratios. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 3:265–274 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mueller, E.A., Kovarik, J.M., van Bree, J.B. et al. Improved Dose Linearity of Cyclosporine Pharmacokinetics from a Microemulsion Formulation. Pharm Res 11, 301–304 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018923912135

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018923912135

Navigation