Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Environmental consequences of treating cattle with the antiparasitic drug ivermectin

Abstract

Ivermectin (22,23-dihydroavermectin B1) is a recently discovered, persistent, broad-spectrum, antiparasitic drug of unpredecented potency1,2 which is now routinely administered to cattle, horses, sheep and pigs in many countries. In cattle, it is an efficient control for parasitic gastrointestinal and respiratory tract nematodes, warble fly, mites, lice and ticks3–6. However, most of the ivermectin dose is ultimately eliminated in the faeces of the treated animals7 where it has been shown to have an insecticidal effect8–11 on the larvae of economically important, dung-breeding, haematophagous Diptera. Nevertheless, the effects of excreted ivermectin on the cowpat fauna as a whole and the wider consequences of such effects have not previously been considered. In field trials reported here, the faeces of calves fitted with rumenal boluses delivering ivermectin at 40 μg per kg per day, failed to degrade in the normal way and this failure was associated with the absence of dung-degrading insects. Faeces from placebo-treated controls contained a characteristic dung-degrading invertebrate community and were largely degraded within 100 days. These results indicate that the increasing widespread use of ivermectin may have important environmental consequences for pastureland.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burg, R. W. et al. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 15, 361–367 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Egerton, J. R. et al. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 15, 372–378 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Armour, J., Bairdon, K. & Preston, J. M. Vet. Rec. 107, 226–227 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barth, D. & Sutherland, I. H. Zentbl Bakt. ParasilKde I Abt. 267, 319 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Centurier, C. & Barth, D. Zentbl. Bakt. ParasilKde I Abt. 267, 319 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Egerton, J. R. et al. Br. vet. J. 136, 88–97 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Campbell, W. C., Fisher, M. H., Stapley, E. O., Albers-Schonberg, G. & Jacob, T. A. Science 221, 823–828 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Miller, J. A., Kunz, S. E., Oehler, D. D. & Miller, R. W. J. Econ. Ent. 74, 608–611 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schmidt, C. D. Envir. Ent. 12, 455–457 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Drummond, R. O. S. West. Ent. Suppl. 7, 34–42 (1985).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmidt, C. D. & Kunz, S. E. J. Econ. Ent. 73, 702–703 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chisholm, M. D. thesis, Bristol Univ. (1980).

  13. Skidmore, P. The Insects Of the Cow Duing Community (Aidgap Ling Ltd, Dorset, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marsh, R. & Campling, R. C. Herb. Abstr. 40, 123–130 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Greehalgh, J. F. D. & Reid, G. W. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 72, 223–228 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Anderson, J. R., Merritt, R. W. & Loomis, E. C. J. Econ. Ent. 77, 133–141 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bornemissza, G. F. Australian Meat Research Committee Review 30, 1–30 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Anderson, J. R. & Loomis, E. C. Calif, Agric. 32, 31–32 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wall, R., Strong, L. Environmental consequences of treating cattle with the antiparasitic drug ivermectin. Nature 327, 418–421 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1038/327418a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/327418a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing