General Obstetrics and Gynecology: Gynecology
Duloxetine versus placebo in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence,☆☆,

Presented at the Twenty-Second Annual Meeting of the American Urogynecologic Society, Chicago, Ill, October 25-28, 2001.
https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.124840Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of duloxetine, a selective inhibitor of serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake, in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Study Design: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted in 553 women aged 18 to 65 years with a predominant symptom of stress urinary incontinence. Subjects were randomized to placebo (n = 138 women) or duloxetine at one of three doses (20 mg/d, n = 138 women; 40 mg/d, n = 137 women; or 80 mg/d, n = 140 women). Outcome variables that were assessed after 12 weeks of treatment included incontinence episode frequency recorded in a real-time diary and answers provided to the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale and the Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire. Results: Duloxetine was associated with significant and dose-dependent decreases in incontinence episode frequency that paralleled improvements that were observed in the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale and the Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire. The median incontinence episode frequency decrease with the use of the pooled diary analysis with placebo was 41% compared with 54% for duloxetine 20 mg per day (P =.06), 59% for duloxetine 40 mg per day (P =.002), and 64% for duloxetine 80 mg per day (P <.001). One half of the subjects at the 80 mg per day dose had a ≥64% reduction in incontinence episode frequency (P <.001 vs placebo); 67% had ≥50% reduction (P =.001 vs placebo). These improvements were observed despite significant concurrent dose-dependent increases in the average voiding interval in the duloxetine groups compared with the placebo group. Similar statistically significant improvements were demonstrated in a subgroup of 163 subjects who had more severe stress urinary incontinence (≥14 incontinence episode frequency per week; 49%-64% reduction in incontinence episode frequency in the duloxetine groups compared with 30% in the placebo group). Discontinuation rates for adverse events were 5% for placebo and 9%, 12%, and 15% for duloxetine 20, 40, and 80 mg per day, respectively (P =.04). Nausea was the most common symptom that led to discontinuation. None of the adverse events that were reported were considered to be clinically severe. Conclusion: This trial provides evidence for the efficacy and safety of duloxetine as a pharmacologic agent for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:40-8.)

Section snippets

Material and methods

Incontinent female outpatients aged 18 to 65 years who had a clinical diagnosis of SUI for at least 3 months in duration were invited to participate in this double-blind, placebo controlled, randomized clinical trial. To enroll, subjects must have reported a predominant symptom of SUI with ≥4 incontinent episodes per week, where an episode was defined as an easily noticeable leakage of urine that wets a pad or clothing and occurs with a physical stress such as coughing, sneezing, or exercising.

Results

Originally 1124 female subjects were screened for eligibility; 553 women met entry criteria and were randomized to either duloxetine 20 mg/day (n = 138 women), duloxetine 40 mg/day (n = 137 women), duloxetine 80 mg/day (n = 140 women), or placebo (n = 138 women). Ninety-six percent of the women (132/138) receiving placebo, 96% of the women (132/138) receiving duloxetine 20 mg/day, 94% of the women (129/137) receiving duloxetine 40 mg/day, and 93% of the women (130/140) receiving duloxetine 80

Comment

The results of this study provide evidence for the efficacy of duloxetine as a pharmacologic agent for the treatment of SUI, with significant improvements in both IEF and quality of life. The subgroup analysis of the more severely incontinent subjects (IEF ≥14 at baseline) indicated that improvements that were observed with duloxetine treatment were maintained, despite increased baseline incontinence severity.

The significant dose-dependent response to duloxetine in the current trial differs

Acknowledgements

We thank Stephanie C. Koke, MS, for her assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.

References (26)

  • RA Appell et al.

    Prospective randomized controlled trial of extended-release oxybutynin chloride and tolterodine tartrate in the treatment of overactive bladder: results of the OBJECT study

    Mayo Clin Proc

    (2001)
  • DM Gleason et al.

    Evaluation of a new once-daily formulation of oxybutynin for the treatment of urinary urge incontinence

    Urology

    (1999)
  • H Danuser et al.

    Spinal 5-HT2 receptor-mediated facilitation of pudendal nerve reflexes in the anaesthetized cat

    Br J Pharmacol

    (1996)
  • Cited by (310)

    • Management of Urologic Disorders and the Pharmacist's Role in Urinary Incontinence

      2019, Encyclopedia of Pharmacy Practice and Clinical Pharmacy: Volumes 1-3
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by Eli Lilly and Company.

    ☆☆

    The members of the Duloxetine Urinary Incontinence Study Group are listed in the Appendix.

    Reprint requests: Richard C. Bump, MD, Eli Lilly and Company Corporate Center, DC 2200, Indianapolis, IN 46285. E-mail: bump_richard@ lilly.com

    View full text