Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of Anti-Drug Antibodies in Preclinical Pharmacokinetic Assessment

  • Research Article
  • Published:
The AAPS Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The administration of human biotherapeutics is often associated with a higher incidence of immunogenicity in preclinical species. The presence of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) in the test samples can affect the accurate measurement of therapeutic protein (TP) in bioanalytical methods designed to support pharmacokinetic (PK) and toxicokinetic (TK) assessments. The impact can vary depending on the bioanalytical method platform and study dosing design. The goal of this study is to evaluate the impact of ADA response on the bioanalytical methods in support of PK/TK and the associated study data interpretation. Sprague Dawley rats were administered with four weekly doses of 50 mg/kg TP, a humanized monoclonal antibody. The TP in serum samples was measured using three bioanalytical methods that quantified bound and/or unbound TP to ADA. The ADA response in the animals was classified into negative, low, medium, and high based on the magnitude of the response. The presence of ADA in samples led to discrepant TP measurements between the methods, especially at time points where the TP concentrations were low. This could be due to ADA interference to the accurate measurement of ADA-bound TP concentrations. The TP concentration at last time point (C last) was reduced by 82.8%, 98.6%, and 99.8%, respectively, for samples containing low, medium, and high levels of ADA. The interfering effects of the ADA on bioanalytical methods and exposure were evident as early as 2 weeks post-dosing. This modeling approach can provide the better understanding of ADA impact on PK exposure in multiple doses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chirmule N, Jawa V, Meibohm B. Immunogenicity to therapeutic proteins: impact on PK/PD and efficacy. AAPS J. 2012;14(2):296–302.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Swanson SJ, Bussiere J. Immunogenicity assessment in non-clinical studies. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2012;15(3):337–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee J et al. Bioanalytical approaches to quantify “total” and “free” therapeutic antibodies and their targets: technical challenges and PK/PD applications over the course of drug development. AAPS J. 2011;13(1):99–110.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee J, Ma H. Specificity and selectivity evaluations of ligand binding assay of protein therapeutics against concomitant drugs and related endogenous proteins. AAPS J. 2007;9(2):E164–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thway TM et al. Experimental and statistical approaches in method cross-validation to support pharmacokinetic decisions. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2009;49(3):613–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Thway TM et al. Model-based strategy for bioanalytical method comparison: measurement of a soluble ligand as a biomarker. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2012;58:65–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shih JY et al. Implementation of a universal analytical method in early-stage development of human antibody therapeutics: application to pharmacokinetic assessment for candidate selection. Bioanalysis. 2012;4(19):2357–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bautista AC, Salimi-Moosavi H, Jawa V. Universal immunoassay applied during early development of large molecules to understand impact of immunogenicity on biotherapeutic exposure. AAPS J. 2012;14(4):843–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. White JT, Golob M, Sailstad J. Understanding and mitigating impact of immunogenicity on pharmacokinetic assays. Bioanalysis. 2011;3(16):1799–803.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stevenson L et al. Paradigm of combination biologics: analytical challenges related to pharmacokinetic assays and interpretation of pharmacokinetic and immunogenicity results. Bioanalysis. 2011;3(5):487–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. International Conference on Harmonisation; addendum to International Conference on Harmonisation Guidance on S6 Preclinical Safety Evaluation of Biotechnology-Derived Pharmaceuticals; availability. Notice. Fed Regist. 2012; 77(97):29665–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial support for this review was provided by Amgen Inc. We would like to thank Dr. Peng Luan (Amgen Inc. Thousand Oaks, CA) for his critical review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theingi M. Thway.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thway, T.M., Magana, I., Bautista, A. et al. Impact of Anti-Drug Antibodies in Preclinical Pharmacokinetic Assessment. AAPS J 15, 856–863 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-013-9484-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-013-9484-4

Key words

Navigation