ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Use of Herbs Among Adults Based on Evidence-Based Indications: Findings From the National Health Interview Survey

https://doi.org/10.4065/82.5.561Get rights and content

OBJECTIVE

To examine the extent to which US adults use herbs (herbal supplements) in accordance with evidence-based indications.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

The Alternative Health supplement of the 2002 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) is part of an annual, nationally representative survey of US adults. It contains data on adults' use of the 10 herbs most commonly taken to treat a specific health condition in the past year (January 1 to December 31, 2002). The Natural Standard database was used to formulate evidence-based standards for herb use. These standards were applied to the NHIS data to identify groups of people who used herbs appropriately and inappropriately, using a multivariable logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Of the 30,617 adults surveyed, 5787 (18.9%) consumed herbs in the past 12 months; of those, 3315 (57.3%) used herbs to treat a specific health condition. Among people who used only 1 herb (except echinacea and ginseng), approximately one third used it consonant with evidence-based indications. Women and people with a college education were more likely to use herbs (with the exception of echinacea) concordant with scientific evidence. Adults younger than 60 years and black adults were significantly less likely to use herbs (with the exception of echinacea) based on evidentiary referents than their counterparts. However, for echinacea users, no significant differences were detected.

CONCLUSION

Roughly two thirds of adults using commonly consumed herbs (except echinacea) did not do so in accordance with evidence-based indications. Health care professionals should take a proactive role, and public health policies should disseminate evidence-based information regarding consumption of herbal products.

Section snippets

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

This study is based on data from the Alternative Health/Complementary and Alternative Medicine supplement, the Sample Adult Core component, and the Family Core component of the 2002 NHIS.20 The NHIS is an ongoing cross-sectional survey of a nationally representative sample of the civilian noninstitutionalized household population of the United States. Both basic health and demographic information are collected on all household members, generally on the basis of a face-to-face interview, but

RESULTS

Of 609 eligible study participants, 64.8% were women and the mean ± SD age of the population was 41.4±14 years (range, 18-85 years). Most of the eligible population (81.3%) was white (non-Hispanic white), with 8.1% being black, 7.9% Hispanic, and the remaining 2.7% of other ethnicity. Approximately one fourth (25.9%) of the eligible participants had an education level lower than or equal to a high school diploma, 59.1% had a post-high school or college equivalent education, and 15.0% had a

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this is the first large US population-based study of whether consumers use herbs in accordance with evidence-based indications. Although previous studies have explored the reasons why people take supplements, they did not generally evaluate the use based on an external, evidence-based standard, and most studies did not evaluate individual herbs. Previous studies have reported that people use herbal supplements to promote generalhealth21, 22, 23 and to treat or prevent

CONCLUSION

With the exception of echinacea and ginseng, two thirds of respondents did not use commonly consumed herbs in consonance with a scientific standard. These results suggest that physicians, pharmacists, and other health care professionals should proactively educate consumers and advocate public health policies that would disseminate evidence-based information on the appropriate use of herbs. Further research is needed to confirm the study findings and evaluate mechanisms that enhance

REFERENCES (39)

  • S Gunther et al.

    Demographic and health-related correlates of herbal and specialty supplement use

    J Am Diet Assoc

    (2004)
  • DM Eisenberg et al.

    Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: results of a follow-up national survey

    JAMA

    (1998)
  • PM Barnes et al.

    Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use Among Adults: United States, 2002

    (2004)
  • JP Kelly et al.

    Recent trends in use of herbal and other natural products

    Arch Intern Med

    (2005)
  • G Gugliotta

    Health concerns grow over herbal aids: as industry booms, analysis suggests rising toll in illness and death

    Washington Post

    (March 19, 2000)
  • Natural Marketing Institute

    The 2005 Health & Wellness Trends Report: Dietary Supplements

    (2005)
  • Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994. Pub L No. 103-417, Stat 4325 (codified at USC §301...
  • G Pinn

    Adverse effects associated with herbal medicine

    Aust Fam Physician

    (2001)
  • J Barnes et al.

    Different standards for reporting ADRs to herbal remedies and conventional OTC medicines: face-to-face interviews with 515 users of herbal remedies

    Br J Clin Pharmacol

    (1998)
  • Cited by (107)

    • The global regulatory framework for medicinal plants

      2023, Pharmacognosy: Fundamentals, Applications, and Strategies, Second Edition
    • Cytochrome P450 inhibition activities of non-standardized botanical products

      2022, Journal of Ethnopharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Interestingly, most botanical medicines are used in conjunction with conventional therapy rather than as a replacement (Eisenberg et al., 1993; Enioutina et al., 2017). In the United States, the concurrent use of botanical medicine is reported to be among 20–30% of conventional drug users (Bardia et al., 2007; Bent, 2008) and about 36–38% of patients with cancer after chemotherapy (Engdal et al., 2008; Molassiotis et al., 2005). In some Asian countries such as Taiwan and Korea, a high proportion of patients are simultaneously administering botanical products and prescribed medicine (Chen et al., 2013; Seo et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2014a).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was made possible by grant P01 ES012020 from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the Office of Dietary Supplements, National Institutes of Health. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health.

    View full text