Visual Overview
Abstract
Several nuclear receptor (NR) superfamily members are known to be the molecular target of either the small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) or ubiquitin-signaling pathways. However, little is currently known regarding how these two post-translational modifications interact to control NR biology. We show that SUMO and ubiquitin circuitry coordinately modifies the pregnane X receptor (PXR, NR1I2) to play a key role in regulating PXR protein stability, transactivation capacity, and transcriptional repression. The SUMOylation and ubiquitylation of PXR is increased in a ligand- and tumor necrosis factor alpha–dependent manner in hepatocytes. The SUMO-E3 ligase enzymes protein inhibitor of activated signal transducer and activator of transcription-1 (STAT1) STAT-1 (PIAS1) and protein inhibitor of activated STAT Y (PIASy) drive high levels of PXR SUMOylation. Expression of protein inhibitor of activated stat 1 selectively increases SUMO(3)ylation as well as PXR-mediated induction of cytochrome P450, family 3, subfamily A and the xenobiotic response. The PIASy-mediated SUMO(1)ylation imparts a transcriptionally repressive function by ameliorating interaction of PXR with coactivator protein peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-1-alpha. The SUMO modification of PXR is effectively antagonized by the SUMO protease sentrin protease (SENP) 2, whereas SENP3 and SENP6 proteases are highly active in the removal of SUMO2/3 chains. The PIASy-mediated SUMO(1)ylation of PXR inhibits ubiquitin-mediated degradation of this important liver-enriched NR by the 26S proteasome. Our data reveal a working model that delineates the interactive role that these two post-translational modifications play in reconciling PXR-mediated gene activation of the xenobiotic response versus transcriptional repression of the proinflammatory response in hepatocytes. Taken together, our data reveal that the SUMOylation and ubiquitylation of the PXR interface in a fundamental manner directs its biologic function in the liver in response to xenobiotic or inflammatory stress.
Footnotes
- Received April 30, 2015.
- Accepted June 10, 2015.
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health National Institute of Digestive, Diabetic, and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) [Grant R01DK090558] (to J.S.), University of Kansas, Strategic Initiative Grant [INS0073115], and by an award from the Centers of Biomedical Research Excellence (COBRE) and the National Institutes of Health National Institute of General Medical Sciences [Grant P20 GM103549]. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of NIH.
- Copyright © 2015 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
DMD articles become freely available 12 months after publication, and remain freely available for 5 years.Non-open access articles that fall outside this five year window are available only to institutional subscribers and current ASPET members, or through the article purchase feature at the bottom of the page.
|
